5. Warranty
  • 7 Minutes to read
  • PDF

5. Warranty

  • PDF

Article summary

5.1 Waterproofing warranties are typically written such that there is very little chance of a claim being recognised and if it is – it is limited to minor repair wor

They typically do not cover CONSEQUENTIAL loss. They will fix the membrane, but not the damage that the leak causes.

5.2 There are some companies that offer a Consequential damages warranty. These forms of warranties require the use of the manufacturers specified products (not the cheapest products), strict inspections by the manufacturer + a cost of approx. 1% of the waterproofing contract value to pay for an insurance policy that has as many conditions as the warranty itself (out clauses) with the insurance policy set at a pre agreed maximum claim value of around $1m.

5.3 Get a copy of the proposed warranty for review and acceptance by the client BEFORE approving the use of any products

5.4 Ensure the proposed subcontractor is a licensed applicator

5.5 Arrange for the membrane manufacturer to visit site regularly to inspect works to ensure compliance

image.png
Introduction
During the installation of a waterproof membrane, particularly liquid membranes, there is frequently conjecture between the Concreting Contractor and the waterproofing contractor in the assessment of the surface finish.

The simple reason for this is that Builders normally specify the concrete finishes required on a project in accordance with AS3610. For an architectural project where membranes are installed the normal expected standard Class 2 which is designed to define the limits of flatness and smoothness.

The Concreting Contractors finishes his work to this standard however complying with the requirements of this standard does not necessarily produce a surface that is suitable for a membrane application.

The waterproofing contractor tenders the installation of the membrane on the basiss that the surface provided is fit for a membrane application and conflict arises.

The purpose of this Bulletin is to define the requirements for a surface finish suitable for a liquid membrane application and to outline the common differences that can exist between a AS3610 Class 2 surface finish and a finish suitable for a membrane application.

Liquid Membrane Application
The primary requirement of an effective liquid membrane application involve achieving good adhesion to the substrate and the application of a uniform minimum dry fil thickness over the entire surface to be waterproofed.

To achieve this there are a number of minimum requirements of the substrate surface in addition to it being sufficiently structurally sound to support the membrane application.

Surface Cleanliness
The substrate surface must be clean and free from loose particles (dust and dirt) and all surface contaminants that may hinder the achievement of good bonding characteristics.

This requirement not only refers to the dirt and dust tracked in from adjacent areas but also refers to the micro-surface finish of the concrete that may be loosely bound due to the finishing proces of the concrete. As an example, if the finishing of the concrete is carried out with excessive bleed water remaining, the cement fines are drawn to the surface and create a weakly bound micro-surface on the concrete.

Surface Porosity
A liquid waterproof membrane is designed to achieve a mechanical bond by penetrating the micro-surface of the substrate and keying firmly to the concrete. T o achieve this, the surface must obviously be open pored (porous) to allow the required penetration into the concrete.

Highly polished or overworked concrete are not surfaces that are suitable for a membrane application.

Care should also be taken wiht grinding that can turn a porous surface inot a low permeability surface by pressure fine particles into the existing pores of the concrete.

Surface Finish
Liquid membranes are applied as combination of solid film forming material combined with a carrier solvent (frequently water). After application the film possesses some degree of self-leveling or self-smoothing properties as the carrier solvent evaporates leaving the dry film.

It is therefore essential, to achieve a uniform dry film thickness, that the surface finish be relatively smooth and free from sharp edges or significant protrusions or intrusions.
image.png
When applied to a sharp edge (Figure 1), a liquid membrane will tend to flow away from the edge as it dries resulting in a low dry film thickness being achieved at the sharp edge. This is typical of any liquid material application.
image.png
For the same reasons, when a membrane is applied over a localized deformation, be it intrusions or protrusions, the liquid material will tend to flow from the high points during the drying process leaving a film with a lower dry film thickness at the peak of the deformation.

Surface Accessibility
Surfaces to which a liquid membrane is to be applied must be easily accessible to a roller or brush application. This may appear to be an obvious criterion however it is frequently overlooked in the surface preparation.

In the case of off-form concrete the resulting surface frequently has numerous voids commonly called blow holes. These can either be visible voids or voids hidden under a thin cementitious skin which is very weak and unsuitable for a membrane application.

Apart from the face that these blow holes normally exhibit sharp edges as described above, they also frequently result in inaccessible surfaces within the void.
image.png
Figure 3 represents the result when a membrane is applied ot the surface is that there are significant surfaces within the void that are totally uncoated. This is unavoidable when the interior of the void is not accessible.

Surface Requirements for Membrane Application
In summary therefore, the surface requirements suitable for a membrane application are:-
a. Structurally sound
b. Free of dust and other contaminants
c. Porous
d. Free from localized surface defects such as protrusions and intrusions.

While the first two or even 3 of these requirements are considered the waterproofing contractors responsibility, the fourth is frequently considered by the waterproofing contractor as being part of the builder's responsibility to provide a suitable surface.

Concrete Finish in Architectural Building
As outlined previously a building specification normally calls up a concrete finish in accordance with Clause 2 of As3610 for an architectural building.

AS3610 is principally concerned with the broadspan surface finish as far as smoothness and levels and less concerned about the localised defects for which it allows a certain tolerance.

AS3610 Class 2 therefore allows a certain density of blow holes. Blowholes present a major problem for a successful membrane application as described above so the surface needs to be totally free of these defects for the surface to be suitable for a membrane application.

AS3610 Class 2 also allows for a surface deviation over extended lengths. While the extent of these deviations spread over the extended length presents no problem for a successful membrane application, when the extended of the deviation is limited to an isolated area it does become a problem. A fine scrabbled surface may conform to AS3610 but is unsuitable for a membrane application due the numerous peaks wihtin a small localized area.

Responsibility
Standard contruction procedure is to specify the concrete finish required in accordance with AS3610.

Waterproofing requirements for concrete finish may exceed the requirements of AS3610.

Adjustments to the concrete surface profile may occur after pouring, such as adjustments to set down areas, resulting in damaged surfaces.

Damage to and contamination of the concrete surface can occur between the Concreting Contractor handover and the waterproofing contractor commencing work.

The following responsibilities are therefore proposed to avoid conflict and unexpected costs being incurred by any party.

Builder Responsibility

  • Builder is responsible for nominating th estandard of surface finish required from the Concreting Contractor.
  • Builder is responsible for nominating a standard of surface finish to be supplied to the waterproofing contractor at the time of tender.
  • Builder is responsible for providing a surface finish in accordance with AS3610 to the waterproofing contractor.

This means the builder is responsible for the costs of remediating and damage resulting from other trades that occurs between the Concreting Contractors handover and the builder's handover to the waterproofing contractor restoring the surface to a standard conforming to the Class of surface nominated under AS3610.

Remediation includes the removal of surface contaminants such as render deposits or the spills and the remediation of surface damage such as step breakouts or surface impact damage.

Concreting Contractor Responsibility

  • The Concreting Contractor is responsible for handing over a surface finish in accordance with the specified Class under AS3610 to the Builder.

This includes the remediation of any changes to the surface after pouring such as set down area adjustments to conform to specified Class under AS3610.

Waterproofing Contractor Responsibility

  • The Waterproofing Contractor is responsible for all surface remediation necessary to upgrade the surface finish from the specified finish in accordance with AS3610.

The waterproofing contractor should therefore allow in tendering:

  • for filling surface defects such as blowholes to the extent permitted the under the relevant class of AS3610.
  • for beveling or rounding sharp corners such as steps for set down edges
  • for either smoothing or applying additional membrane over short distance surface profile defomations allowable under the relevant class of AS3610 to achieve the required dry film thickness over the peaks (Ref Figure 4)
    image.png
    While the above defines where responsibilities lie in the process of achieving a suitable surface finish to the concrete, it does not obviate disputes regarding the assessment of surface in relation to AS3610. This can only be resolved by the appointment of a mediator to which all parties agree to abide.

Was this article helpful?

What's Next